The Politics of Divorce

The temperatures are rising and the boards are buzzing ... this could mean spring is finally here -- either that or we're tackling two - two -TWO hot issues in one! Over the weekend, The New York Times featured an article about presidential hopeful Rudy Giuliani, his family woes and the larger question of the delicate intricacies of blended families. Giuliani was forced to comment on his family discord and the struggles of stepfamilies after his son Andrew, 21, disclosed he had a "little problem" with his stepmother Judith Nathan. And as we all know, "little" is the new "big". Makes you wonder just what those problems really are ... hmmm. Giuliani tactfully offered, "It’s the kind of thing that I think affects a lot of families these days." Well he's certainly no help in letting us in on the dirt!

But he does have a point. As a divorced mom preparing to blend some families of my own, I know it's never easy and often it's even more difficult than you ever imagined it could be. But do these personal issues reflect a campaign problem for Rudy? Or is it more about how the rough spots are managed, rather than the fact of a divorce itself?

On the Morality Debate board, the question nags at a few members. One mom writes:

Life happens, and lots of people are divorced. It doesn't automatically make a negative statement about them, or their ability to lead.

But, then I realized that he has had multiple divorces, and it did give me pause....

Another weighs in:

I don't know why it should affect the way I vote. Lots of people have divorces for a number of reasons.

We've already had a president who was divorced. Ronald Reagan was divorced. Of course he had already been married to his 2nd wife for quite awhile before he ran so no one noticed.

They're also tackling this issue on the Stepmom/Bio Mom Debate board ... one mom in a blended family says:

I find it interesting how this man's personal life is being completely exploited...I have to wonder what the real story is behind his supposed "abandonment" of his children.

When are they going to stick with the real campaign issues?

It's the age-old question, isn't it? Is a politician's personal life relevant to the campaign trail? Does Giuliani's marital track record make him less electable? Or, perhaps, it makes him more in tune with what is the day-to-day reality for millions of families trying to make a second (or third or fourth) marriage work at the same time as treading lightly through the mine fields of stepfamily politics. Where do you see this issue fitting in to your election decisions? How does this debate reflect your own family struggles, if at all? Lay it all out here and tell me what you think!

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: The Politics of Divorce.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://beehive.ivillage.com/system/mt-tb.cgi/932

6 Comments

Steph said:

Take a look at various politicians, their political and personal track records, and see what you think. Bush seems a great father and husband, but many would argue has failed miserably as a leader. Clinton was a tremendous diplomat, yet, cheated on his wife numerous times. I don't think that an individual's personal decision-making ability equates to his/her professional decision-making ability; that is, I might make better decisions in the workplace than I do at home, or vice-versa, but the two aren't the same because the criteria, solutions, and outcomes are completely different at home and at work.

Dani said:

I can understand why it would be focused on. Ronald Reagan was divorced after 8 years and married to Nancy in 1952. That's nearly 30 years of marriage before he became President. I think that shows commitment and that's really what this is about.. if a man can't commit to one woman and not give up when things get rough, can he commit to serving a country with much rougher decisions? This is Rudy's 3rd marriage and the first time he married his 2nd cousin? He catted around on one of his wives too.

Beth said:

I don't believe we should take his personal marital life into account when making the decision on who to vote for. We aren't voting for who we want to be our first family...
We ARE voting for who we feel can lead our country in the best way possible. We are voting for someone who can uphold our consitutional rights, and ensure that are rights aren't re-written into junk. We want someone who will insist that our right to Life, Liberty, and Pursuit of Happiness is given the ability to be fullfilled by all Americans.

GME said:

I'm not sure I know enough about Rudy's marital discord for it to affect my decision on whether or not to vote for him - and really, do I care? Probably not. I mean, Clinton is such a 'player' in his personal life (I live in Central Arkansas, I *know* people he "didn't have sex with" in the same way he "didn't have sex with that woman...Miss Lewinsky") but as a president, he did some good things. I'll look at "will this person be able to make my life and that of my children BETTER over the next 4 to 8 years?" and base my decision on that. I don't think I'll focus on how many times (s)he's been married or how many women/men (s)he's "not" had sex with.

Steph said:

I agree, GME. I think there are pros and cons to a leader with a crappy personal life, after all, if they're a philanderer, it shows one one hand that they can't really be trusted (what politician can?), but on the other, it shows a willingness to take risks, lol.

Steph said:

that should say ON one hand... I can't type for spit today! ;-)

Leave a comment

About the Beehive

What's buzzing on the iVillage message boards? From pregnancy and parenting issues to celebrity gossip to matters of love, sex and more, here's what women are talking about today.

RSS

Archives